Certainly there are aerial technological objects being seen and documented that cannot be attributed to modern human activity. But the leap from that to "aliens" is just absurd.
Given there are aerial vehicles that are not ours, what is the simpler explanation? That aliens crossed light years through interstellar space to visit? Or that there is a remnant popluation of prediluvian hominoids who achieved advanced technology and occupy the Earths mantle?
I mean, we definitely missed bigfoot, a relict hominoid species living under our noses for thousands of years. Is is unthinkable that we also missed hominoids on the other end of the technological spectrum?
Lol 3:00,..."we definitely missed bigfoot" ...yes, we sure did, in the same way that we missed the tooth fairy. Hahaha! Who s this bozo that casually slipped in "bigfoot is real", as if no one would notice.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Aliens? LOL! First!
ReplyDeleteAliens? LOL!
ReplyDeleteCertainly there are aerial technological objects being seen and documented that cannot be attributed to modern human activity. But the leap from that to "aliens" is just absurd.
Given there are aerial vehicles that are not ours, what is the simpler explanation? That aliens crossed light years through interstellar space to visit? Or that there is a remnant popluation of prediluvian hominoids who achieved advanced technology and occupy the Earths mantle?
I mean, we definitely missed bigfoot, a relict hominoid species living under our noses for thousands of years. Is is unthinkable that we also missed hominoids on the other end of the technological spectrum?
Only the dumb stuff lives on the surface.
What about the Gayliens ? I have plenty of evidence they are real...my sore asshole for one thing.
DeleteJoe
Lol 3:00,..."we definitely missed bigfoot" ...yes, we sure did, in the same way that we missed the tooth fairy. Hahaha! Who s this bozo that casually slipped in "bigfoot is real", as if no one would notice.
DeleteClearly an alien.
ReplyDelete